Case Report PDF Download

Intravesical Migration of a Retained Abdominal Gauze: Case Report Diagnostic Dilemma and Bridging gaps in Surgical Safety

Mohamed Mahmoud1,5*, Zainab Osama2, Abbas Mirghani3, Mogahid Mahmoud4

1Department of surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Albutana, Rufaa, Sudan

2Third year Medical Student, University of Albutana, Rufaa, Sudan

3Department of Urology, Hasaheisa teaching Hospital, Hasaheisa, Sudan

4Department of surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Gezira, Sudan

5Department of surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Almughtaribeen, Khartoum, Sudan

*Corresponding Author: Mohamed Mahmoud, Department of surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Albutana, Rufaa, Sudan, E-mail: labeeb20922@gmail.com

Received Date: 

2026-08-18

Accepted Date: 

2026-09-07

Published Date: 

2026-09-30

Citation: Mahmoud M, Osama Z, Mirghani A, Mahmoud M (2026). Intravesical Migration of a Retained Abdominal Gauze: Case Report Diagnostic Dilemma and Bridging gaps in Surgical Safety. Int J Health Sci Biomed. 3(5): 1-3. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22131882

Abstract

Intravesical abdominal gauze, a retained gauze that has migrated into the urinary bladder, is an exceptionally rare but serious complication. It typically arises from chronic inflammation and erosion following abdominal or pelvic surgery. We present a 32-year lady with a one-year history of lower urinary tract symptoms. She had past history of an elective cesarean. Endoscopic removal failed, necessitating open cystotomy, which confirmed the gauze, it was successfully removed, and the patient recovered uneventfully. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges of intravesical migration of surgical gauze and preventive measures, including strict adherence to surgical safety protocols.

Keywords: Intravesical Abdominal gauze; Gauze migration; Cesarean section complication

Introduction

Intravesical foreign bodies are a rare but clinically significant urological condition arising from various causes, including iatrogenic, self-insertion, trauma, or migration from adjacent organs [1]. Retained surgical materials, known as gossypiboma, which typically consists of cotton-based surgical material left unintentionally within the abdominal cavity [2]. Migration into the urinary bladder is exceptionally rare. This can occur gradually through chronic inflammation, pressure necrosis, and erosion into adjacent organs [3], [8]. Patients with intravesical gossypiboma often present with nonspecific lower urinary tract symptoms, including dysuria, hematuria, recurrent urinary tract infections, or bladder outlet obstruction. These clinical features may lead to misdiagnosis as bladder stones or tumors, complicating timely diagnosis and management [4]. Delayed intestinal obstruction due to retained gauze has been reported, emphasizing gaps in surgical safety and perioperative protocols [2], [7]. Although preventable, gossypiboma continues to occur in developing countries, reflecting challenges in surgical systems, documentation, and adherence to safety standards. Reporting rare presentations such as intravesical migration is essential to improve clinical awareness, facilitate early diagnosis, and reinforce preventive measures.

Case Presentation

A lady of 32 years, a housewife from Hasaheisa, a middle of Sudan, presented with burning micturition and urge incontinence for over one year. She reported dyspareunia, suprapubic pain, and hesitancy, but there was no fever or hematuria. She is para two, the last outcome of an elective cesarean section 30 months ago, with no history of wound infection or delayed healing. During this time, it has been seen by many medical professionals, medical officers, surgeons, and obstetricians who were suggested investigations and treated accordingly but without improvement. On examination she is vitally well with a transverse suprapubic surgical scar, a negative cough impulse, and mild suprapubic tenderness. Laboratory investigations revealed pus cells, 3 to 7 red blood cells in urine, a normal renal function test, and a bladder mass measuring 7.5*12 cm seen in abdominal ultrasound. Patient diagnosed with bladder mass; planned for cystoscopy +/- proceed. Under spinal anesthesia, the lithotomy position cystoscope size 16 Fr passed smoothly, and surprisingly, a gauze stuck to the anterior wall of the urinary bladder was found; no mass was seen [Figure 1]. Efforts were made to remove the gauze by cystoscope but failed, so the decision of conversion to open removal was made. Through a transverse suprapubic incision in the abdomen, there were adhesions between the urinary bladder and small bowel, which were released; however, the bladder opened vertically, and the abdominal gauze was identified and removed [Figure 2].


Figure 1: cystoscopy view showing intravesical abdominal gauze


Figure 2: removed abdominal gauze

Discussion

Intravesical gossypiboma represents an exceptionally rare but serious complication of retained surgical material. The migration of a surgical gauze into the bladder, as seen in this patient, is an uncommon phenomenon that typically occurs through a gradual process of chronic inflammation, pressure necrosis, and eventual erosion from the peritoneal cavity into the viscera [2]. The prolonged interval between the initial surgery and presentation, a period during which the patient remained largely asymptomatic aside from chronic lower urinary tract symptoms, is consistent with other reports from Sudan where retained surgical items have remained undetected for years [1, 3]. This study report uncommon presentation during elective cesarean section, which is least likely to be associated with this complication, in contrast to Bashir et al., who report retained abdominal gauze with a previous history of hysterectomy, which is major pelvic surgery.

The clinical presentation in this case was nonspecific and often mimicked more common urological conditions such as recurrent urinary tract infections, bladder stones, or bladder tumors [3]. This diagnostic ambiguity led to the patient being evaluated by multiple clinicians—including medical officers, surgeons, and obstetricians—without symptom improvement, underscoring the risk of misdiagnosis. In resource-limited settings where access to advanced imaging such as computed tomography is limited, reliance on ultrasound may not provide definitive identification of a gossypiboma. In this case, ultrasound revealed a large bladder mass, which was initially presumed to be a neoplasm. This pattern of misdiagnosis is similar to a recent Sudanese report where a retained sponge was initially mistaken for an ovarian cyst [1].

A definitive diagnosis was made intraoperatively during cystoscopy, which unexpectedly revealed a gauze adherent to the anterior bladder wall rather than a solid mass. Endoscopic removal was unsuccessful due to the gauze’s size and adherence, necessitating open cystotomy for extraction. This approach is consistent with the standard of care for large or embedded intravesical foreign bodies, where open surgery ensures complete removal and allows for the management of any associated adhesions or fistulous tracts [1].

This case reinforces several critical lessons. First, gossypiboma should remain a differential diagnosis in any patient with a history of prior surgery who presents with unexplained lower urinary tract symptoms or a bladder mass, even years after the initial procedure [3]. Second, it highlights the importance of adhering to perioperative safety protocols, such as standardized sponge counts and surgical checklists, which are essential preventive measures. Finally, reporting rare presentations like intravesical migration is crucial to improving clinical awareness, facilitating earlier diagnosis, and ultimately preventing the significant morbidity associated with this condition.

Ethical Approval

This case report was conducted in accordance with institutional ethical standards. Informed consent for clinical evaluation and publication was obtained from the patient.

Author Contributions

Mohamed Mahmoud conceptualized and authored the case report, collected clinical data, Abbass Mirghani performed the surgery. Zainab Osama conducted the literature review, and Mogahid Mahmoud drafted the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to this case report.

Funding

This case report received no specific grant from any funding agency.

References

  1. Odoemene CA, Onuh CA (2017). Foreign bodies in the urinary bladder – case series. J West Afr Coll Surg. 7(3):124–136.

  2. Elamin HOA, Masoud MS, Mohamed Ali KSE(2024). Unintentionally retained lap sponge mimicking an ovarian cyst two years after Caesarean section in a 37-year-old patient: case report of a rare "never event" in Sudan. Patient Saf Surg. 18(1):26.

  3. Bashir SI, Babiker AY, Elsadig MA(2023). Delayed intestinal obstruction from an unintentionally retained surgical gauze in a 24-year-old woman two years after caesarean section: a case report. Patient Saf Surg. 17(1):19.

  4. Kalathia J, Talreja B (2025). Intravesical encrusted gossypiboma mimicking bladder stone: A case report and review of the literature. Urol Case Rep. 63:103233.

  5. Gebreselassie KH, Mamo RT, Mohammed YE (2025). Transurethral migration of vesical gossypiboma following open prostatectomy: a case report and review of the literature. J Surg Case Rep. 2025(4):rjaf170.

  6. Saxena N, Kardam DK, Chauhan R(2021). Gossypiboma-successful retrieval through laparoscopy: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 84:106109.

  7. Kashima S, Yamamoto R, Miura Y, Abe A, Togashi H,et al. (2014). An intravesical foreign body by migration of remnant gauze into the bladder: a case report. Hinyokika Kiyo. 60(2):83–86.

  8. Baset GY, Seyar F, Hussain Pour ZH, Karimi QA (2024). Acute bowel obstruction due to transmural migration of gossypiboma: A case report. Int Med Case Rep J. 17:177–180.

  9. Tarimo OB, Kobelo JC, Moshi PG, Kishe A, Kimaryo D, et al. (2026). Intestinal obstruction due to migrated surgical gauze (gossypiboma) 1 year after cesarean section: a rare case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 138(2):188–192.

Copyright

© 2026 The Author(s). Published by Epic Globe Publisher. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0).